ERAstar: A high-resolution ocean forcing product

© 2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other worksTo address the growing demand for accurate high-resolution ocean wind forcing from the ocean modeling community, we develop a new forcing product, ERA*, by means of a geolocated scatterometer-based correction applied to the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis or ERA-interim (hereafter referred to as ERAi). This method successfully corrects for local wind vector biases present in the ERAi output globally. Several configurations of the ERA* are tested using complementary scatterometer data [advanced scatterometer (ASCAT)-A/B and oceansat-2 scatterometer (OSCAT)] accumulated over different temporal windows, verified against independent scatterometer data [HY-2A scatterometer (HSCAT)], and evaluated through spectral analysis to assess the geophysical consistency of the new stress equivalent wind fields (U10S). Due to the high quality of the scatterometer U10S, ERA* contains some of the physical processes missing or misrepresented in ERAi. Although the method is highly dependent on sampling, it shows potential, notably in the tropics. Short temporal windows are preferred, to avoid oversmoothing of the U10S fields. Thus, corrections based on increased scatterometer sampling (use of multiple scatterometers) are required to capture the detailed forcing errors. When verified against HSCAT, the ERA* configurations based on multiple scatterometers reduce the vector root-mean-square difference about 10% with respect to that of ERAi. ERA* also shows a significant increase in small-scale true wind variability, observed in the U10S spectral slopes. In particular, the ERA* spectral slopes consistently lay between those of HSCAT and ERAi, but closer to HSCAT, suggesting that ERA* effectively adds spatial scales of about 50 km, substantially smaller than those resolved by global numerical weather prediction (NWP) output over the open ocean (about 150 km).Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

Wind Field Retrieval from Satellite Radar Systems

Wind observations are essential for determining the atmospheric flow. In particular, sea-surface wind observations are very useful for many meteorological and oceanographic applications. In this respect, most of the satellite remote-sensing radar systems can provide sea-surface wind information. This thesis reviews the current wind retrieval procedures for such systems, identifies the most significant unresolved problems, and proposes new methods to overcome such problems.In order to invert the geophysical model function (GMF), which relates the radar backscatter measurement with the wind speed and direction (unknowns), two independent measurements over the same scene (wind cell) are at least needed. The degree of independence of such measurements is given by the azimuth (view) angle separation among them. This thesis is focused on improving the wind retrieval for determined systems (two or more measurements) with poor azimuth diversity and for underdetermined systems (one single measurement). For such purpose, observations from two different radar systems, i.e., SeaWinds and SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar), are used.The wind retrieval methods proposed in this book for determined (Multiple Solution Scheme, denoted MSS) and underdetermined (SAR Wind Retrieval Algorithm, denoted SWRA) systems are based on Bayesian methodology, that is, on maximizing the probability of obtaining the "true" wind given the radar measurements and the a priori wind information (often provided by numerical weather prediction models), assuming that all wind information sources contain errors. In contrast with the standard procedure for determined systems, the MSS fully uses the information obtained from inversion, which turns out to positively impact the wind retrieval when poor azimuth diversity. On the other hand, in contrast with the various algorithms used nowadays to resolve the wind vector for underdetermined systems, the SWRA assumes not only that the system can not be solved without additional information (underdetermination assumption) but also that both the algorithms and the additional information (which are combined to retrieved the wind vector) contain errors and these should be well characterized. The MSS and the SWRA give promising results, improving the wind retrieval quality as compared to the methods used up to now.Finally, a generic quality control is proposed for determined systems. In general, high-quality retrieved wind fields can be obtained from scatterometer (determined systems) measurements. However, geophysical conditions other than wind (e.g., rain, confused sea state or sea ice) can distort the radar signal and, in turn, substantially decrease the wind retrieval quality. The quality control method uses the inversion residual (which is sensitive to inconsistencies between observations and the geophysical model function that are mainly produced when conditions other than wind dominate the radar backscatter signal) to detect and reject the poor-quality retrievals. The method gives good results, minimizing the rejection of good-quality data and maximizing the rejection of poor-quality data, including rain contamination

Wind Field Retrieval from Satellite Radar Systems

[eng] Wind observations are essential for determining the atmospheric flow. In particular, sea-surface wind observations are very useful for many meteorological and oceanographic applications. In this respect, most of the satellite remote-sensing radar systems can provide sea-surface wind information. This thesis reviews the current wind retrieval procedures for such systems, identifies the most significant unresolved problems, and proposes new methods to overcome such problems. In order to invert the geophysical model function (GMF), which relates the radar backscatter measurement with the wind speed and direction (unknowns), two independent measurements over the same scene (wind cell) are at least needed. The degree of independence of such measurements is given by the azimuth (view) angle separation among them. This thesis is focused on improving the wind retrieval for determined systems (two or more measurements) with poor azimuth diversity and for underdetermined systems (one single measurement). For such purpose, observations from two different radar systems, i.e., SeaWinds and SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar), are used. The wind retrieval methods proposed in this book for determined (Multiple Solution Scheme, denoted MSS) and underdetermined (SAR Wind Retrieval Algorithm, denoted SWRA) systems are based on Bayesian methodology, that is, on maximizing the probability of obtaining the "true" wind given the radar measurements and the a priori wind information (often provided by numerical weather prediction models), assuming that all wind information sources contain errors. In contrast with the standard procedure for determined systems, the MSS fully uses the information obtained from inversion, which turns out to positively impact the wind retrieval when poor azimuth diversity. On the other hand, in contrast with the various algorithms used nowadays to resolve the wind vector for underdetermined systems, the SWRA assumes not only that the system can not be solved without additional information (underdetermination assumption) but also that both the algorithms and the additional information (which are combined to retrieved the wind vector) contain errors and these should be well characterized. The MSS and the SWRA give promising results, improving the wind retrieval quality as compared to the methods used up to now. Finally, a generic quality control is proposed for determined systems. In general, high-quality retrieved wind fields can be obtained from scatterometer (determined systems) measurements. However, geophysical conditions other than wind (e.g., rain, confused sea state or sea ice) can distort the radar signal and, in turn, substantially decrease the wind retrieval quality. The quality control method uses the inversion residual (which is sensitive to inconsistencies between observations and the geophysical model function that are mainly produced when conditions other than wind dominate the radar backscatter signal) to detect and reject the poor-quality retrievals. The method gives good results, minimizing the rejection of good-quality data and maximizing the rejection of poor-quality data, including rain contamination

On mesoscale analysis and ASCAT ambiguity removal

45 pages, 17 figures, 7 tablesIn the so-called two-dimensional variational ambiguity removal (2DVAR) scheme [Vogelzanget al., 2010], the scatterometer observations and the model background (fromthe European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts, ECMWF) are combined using a two-dimensional variational approach, similar to that used in meteorological data assimilation, to provide an analyzed wind field. Since scatterometers provide unique mesoscale information on the wind field, mesoscale analysis is a common challenge for 2DVAR and for mesoscale data assimilation in 4D-var or 3D-var, such as applied using the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) at ECMWF, Meteo France or in the HIRLAM project (www.hirlam.org). This study elaborates on the common problem of specifying the observation and background error covariances in data assimilationThis documentation was developed within the context of the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP SAF), under the Cooperation Agreement dated 29 June 2011, between EUMETSAT and the Met Office, UK, by one or more partners within the NWP SAF. The partners in the NWP SAF are the Met Office, ECMWF, KNMI and Météo FrancePeer Reviewe

RapidScat winds from the OSI SAF

2015 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, 21-25 September 2015, Toulouse.-- 1 page, 2 figures, 3 tablesThe RapidScat scatterometer instrument is a speedy and cost-effective replacement for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) QuikSCAT satellite, which provided a decade-long ocean vector wind observations. RapidScat was launched on 20 September 2014 and mounted on the International Space Station (ISS). The use of generic algorithms for Ku-band scatterometer wind processing allowed us to develop a good quality wind product in a very short time. The wind products with development status are available to users since early December 2014, only one month after the level 2a data became available. Operational status was achieved in March 2015. The good quality of the winds is confirmed by comparisons of RapidScat with NWP, buoy and ASCAT windsPeer Reviewe

Measurements of Air-Sea Interaction from the HY-2A Scatterometer

International Ocean Vector Wind Science Team Meeting (IOVWST), 2-4 June 2014, Brest, France.-- 21 pagesPeer Reviewe

Correlated triple collocation to estimate SMOS, SMAP and ERA5-Land soil moisture errors

The novel Correlated Triple Collocation (CTC) analysis allows to assess three different data sources of similar spatial resolutions, but with two of them being correlated. In this study, the CTC was applied to estimate the unbiased random errors of the global soil moisture (SM) data provided by two L-band satellite missions -the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)- and one numerical model -the ERA5-Land. The three existing SMOS SM products distributed by different research institutions were also analyzed. Preliminary results revealed that errors of SMOS and SMAP SM are correlated, with correlations of ~0.5-0.6. Thus, only ERA5-Land can be considered as independent. The lowest error was obtained for SMAP (0.025 m3m-3), followed by ERA5-Land (0.036 m3m-3). Among the SMOS SM, SMOS-IC had the lowest error (0.046 m3m-3), SMOS-BEC showed an intermediate value (0.048 m3m-3), and SMOS-CATDS had the highest error (0.055 m3m-3). © 2021 IEEE.This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the projects ESP2017-89463-C3-1R and ESP2017-89463-C3-2R, the ICM-CSIC Severo Ochoa Excellence Award CEX2019-000928-S, the CommSensLab-UPC María de Maeztu Excellence Award MDM-2016-0600, and the CSIC Interdisciplinary Thematic Platform TELEDETECT.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

An Improved 2DVAR Ambiguity Removal For ASCAT Wind Retrieval

Presentación para el International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team (2015 IOVWST) Meeting, 19-21 May 2015, Portland, Oregon.-- 21 pagesPeer Reviewe

Impact Of Sub-Cell Wind Variability On ASCAT Wind Quality

Presentación para el International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team (2015 IOVWST) Meeting, 19-21 May 2015, Portland, Oregon.--21 pagesPeer Reviewe

Towards an improved ocean forcing using scatterometer winds

Presentación para el International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team (2015 IOVWST) Meeting, 19-21 May 2015, Portland, Oregon.-- 17 pagesPeer Reviewe